State v. Farmer
Citations
- 235 N.E.3d 530
- 2024 Ohio 351
Syllabus
SEX OFFENSES – SENTENCING – TIER CLASSIFICATION – NUNC PRO TUNC: Where, at defendant's first sentencing hearing, before entering his pleas, the trial court informed defendant that he would be classified as a Tier III sex offender and notified him of his registrations duties, defendant indicated that he understood those duties, and defendant signed the notification-of-duties-to-register form and at a second sentencing hearing, the trial court declared that defendant was a Tier III offender after ensuring that defendant understood that he was still classified as a Tier III offender and there were no objections to this procedure and the tier classification was inadvertently omitted from the second sentencing entry, the cause must be remanded for the trial court to correct the sentencing entry by a nunc pro tunc order to include the Tier III classification.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Christian (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-10· cited 24×
- State v. KaseOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-03· cited 20×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-27· cited 17×
- State v. VeiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-03· cited 8×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.