State v. Farmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reach- ing that conclusion based upon ORS 164.055(1)(c), which provides that theft by receiving constitutes theft in the first degree when “committed by buying, selling, borrowing or lending on the security of the property”
• reach- ing that conclusion based upon ORS 164.055(1)(c), which provides that theft by receiving constitutes theft in the first degree when “committed by buying, selling, borrowing or lending on the security of the property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rose
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-09-25· cited 3×
• Gill v. Cupp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-09· cited 1×
• State v. Azar
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2024-04-11

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-21· cited 10×