State v. Farley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the omission of no contest pleas from a related statute, ORS 131.525(2), was merely “legislative oversight,” and stating that, for purposes of ORS 131.525(2
• explaining what constitutes prohib- ited subsequent prosecution for “same offense” under Article I, section 12
• explaining what constitutes prohibited subsequent prosecution for “same offense” under Article I, section 12

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-07-13· cited 17×
• State v. Toste
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-10-27· cited 9×
• State v. Bannister
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-02-17· cited 8×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-17· cited 5×
• State v. Kambra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 5×
• State v. Warner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-01· cited 5×
• Custer v. Baldwin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22· cited 4×
• State v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-26· cited 3×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-09-16· cited 2×
• State v. Hunt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-21· cited 1×
• State v. Bennett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-11-12
• State v. Nefstad
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-18
• State v. Goff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-01-09