Connecticut Appellate Court· 10/17/2006
State v. Fanning
Citations
- 908 A.2d 573
- 98 Conn. App. 111
- 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[i]f that defendant fails to complete the program satisfactorily, the suspension of the criminal prosecution may be terminated and he or she faces a trial with all of its attendant constitutional guarantees”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dipentima, McLachlan, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,078×
- Daniel Torres v. J. Berbary, SuperintendentSecond Circuit· 2003-08-07· cited 77×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-12-18· cited 61×
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-02· cited 29×
- State v. TrahanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-07-15· cited 27×
- State v. DurantConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-03-14· cited 25×
- State v. DeptulaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-04-05· cited 18×
- State v. EganConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-09-02· cited 17×
- Clerk of the Superior Court v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-02· cited 12×
- State v. GumbsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-04-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.