State v. Fanniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that contracts were in interstate commerce when an out-of- state party negotiated and signed the agreements in, wired payment from, and communicated exclusively from out of state
• holding element of fraudulent inducement is defendant made false material misrepresentation “with knowledge that it was false when made” (emphasis added)
• “[E]ven when the subject matter of a contract is in Texas, courts look to the transaction itself and whether the transaction occurred ‘entirely within one state.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).