Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/27/1989
State v. Falco
Citations
- 783 P.2d 258
- 162 Ariz. 319
- 37 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 25
- 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- A sentence that does not fall within our statutory scheme is unlawful; in this context, an order for probation is a “sentence.”
- A sentence that does not fall within our statutory scheme is unlawful; in this context, an order for probation is a \sentence.\
- Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.3, which permits a trial court to correct “unlawful sentence,” applies to the imposition of probation
- Rule 24.3 applies to probation orders.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brooks, Eubank, Shelley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-11-24· cited 31×
- State of Arizona v. Joel Agustin LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-07-25· cited 20×
- State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-20· cited 18×
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-01-21· cited 10×
- State v. GlasscockCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-12-31· cited 9×
- Neko Anthony Wilson v. Hon. higgins/stateArizona Supreme Court· 2021-07-23· cited 3×
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Don BryantCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-11-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.