State v. Fader
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4139
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for obstructing official business was supported by sufficient evidence. The State presented sufficient evidence on each element to sustain the verdict as a matter of law, namely that appellant, without privilege, and with purpose to prevent, obstruct, or delay the investigation, impeded the police officer's performance of his duties by providing a false identity in an effort to avoid being arrested on an outstanding warrant. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. LazzaroOhio Supreme Court· 1996-08-07· cited 117×
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-04· cited 18×
- State v. BodyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-24· cited 16×
- State v. TerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-17· cited 12×
- State v. McLaughlinOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-06· cited 8×
- State v. ElkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.