New York Court of General Session of the Peace· 10/28/1925
State v. Exum
Citations
- 33 Del. 93
- 3 W.W. Harr. 93
- 130 A. 854
- 1925 Del. LEXIS 20
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a six month term of parole did not meet the jurisdictional threshold for appeal but defendant could file a direct appeal from underlying conviction once sentenced to actual incarceration for violating parole, which occurred six months after original conviction and sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Martin v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware· 1955-09-01· cited 18×
- State v. Superior CourtSupreme Court of Delaware· 1958-05-12· cited 15×
- Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-08-13· cited 15×
- AMER. POLICYHOLDERS'INS. CO. v. PortaleNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1965-07-20· cited 8×
- State v. DawsonNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1925-10-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.