Skip to main content

State v. Evans

Citations

  • 18 S.C. 137
  • 1882 S.C. LEXIS 118

Syllabus

<p>1. Defendant was convicted under an indictment that alleged a burglary in “ a gin-house, situate within the curtilage of the dwelling-house.” Held, that judgment should be arrested, because the indictment failed to allege that the gin-house was within two hundred yards of the dwelling-house and appurtenant to it, two averments that were essential under the statute. Gen. Stat. of 1882, g 2483.</p> <p>2. And the defendant having been tried, convicted and sentenced for statutory burglary, the conviction cannot be referred to the indictment as sufficiently-charging the higher offense of burglary at common law.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing a gin- house that was used to store cotton and to shelter stock was an appurtenance of the dwelling that was located eighty yards away

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.