Skip to main content

State v. Evans

Citations

  • 710 S.W.2d 530
  • 1985 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 3297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that surrebuttal testimony was improper because it did not contradict the state’s rebuttal testimony
  • distinguishing a request for a ballistics expert from the holding in Ake
  • acknowledging rule of Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S. Ct. 1087 (1985
  • defendants did not deny that they shot and killed the victims, so there was no error in withholding state funds for defendant's ballistics expert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, O'Brien, Boaz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.