Skip to main content

State v. Euler

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 235

Syllabus

Trial court thoroughly considered Fish factors in considering appellant's motion to withdraw guilty plea and did not abuse discretion in overall conclusion denying the motion. Trial court did not err in imposing prison sentence where sentence was not contrary to law, court did not make incorrect findings under R.C. 2929.13(B) or (D), R.C. 2929.14 (B)(2)(e) or (C)(4), or R.C. 2929.20(I), and there existed no clear and convincing evidence that the sentence was not supported by record.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.