State v. Eubanks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s discharge after expiration of appellate mandate period, but without according state 10-day portion of window period after hearing on motion for discharge, requires reversal with instructions to bring to trial within 10-day period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rohm
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-08· cited 1×
• State v. Schreiber
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-04· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sherrod v. Franza
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-01-06· cited 55×
• State v. Frazee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-14· cited 20×
• In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-09-24· cited 17×
• Vallieres v. Grossman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-23· cited 10×
• Tascarella v. Seay
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-05· cited 7×
• Rivas v. Oppenborn
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-08· cited 7×
• State v. Veliz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-17· cited 6×
• Heller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-28· cited 5×
• State v. Palmieri
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-19· cited 4×
• State v. Willis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-16· cited 4×
• State v. Eubanks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-06· cited 3×
• State v. Jackson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-27· cited 1×