District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/25/1992
State v. Eubanks
Citations
- 609 So. 2d 107
- 1992 WL 341950
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The best evidence rule requires that if original evidence is available, then no other evidence should be received which is merely substitutionary in nature.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hersey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,598×
- Kehoe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 133×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-05-18· cited 20×
- Onontario of Fla., Inc. v. RP Trucking Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-24· cited 14×
- State v. TaswellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-20· cited 12×
- WIMBLEDON TOWNHOUSE CONDO v. WolfsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-05· cited 11×
- Bascoy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-14· cited 10×
- Rollins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-01· cited 6×
- State v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-28· cited 5×
- Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-22· cited 5×
- Sun Bank of St. Lucie County v. OliverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-09· cited 4×
- C.A. Leasing Service Corp. v. Zorn's (Howard) Equipment Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.