Supreme Court of Kansas· 8/21/2015

State v. Estrada-Vital

Citations

302 Kan. 549
356 P.3d 1058
2015 Kan. LEXIS 714

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting in criminal cases that the burden of proof is on those seeking to invoke an exception to the general rule requiring a search warrant
interpreting the statute's language to mean a defendant must establish the facts necessary to support his or her suppression motion in the district court
\[A]ppellate courts do not make factual findings in the first instance; we only review district court findings.\
\[A]ppellate courts do not make factual findings in the first instance; we only review district court findings.\
\[I]t is incumbent upon a defendant to establish the facts necessary to support his or her suppression motion in the district court.\
lack of factual findings by district court can hamper ability to consider issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.