State v. Estrada-Vital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting in criminal cases that the burden of proof is on those seeking to invoke an exception to the general rule requiring a search warrant
• interpreting the statute's language to mean a defendant must establish the facts necessary to support his or her suppression motion in the district court
• \[A]ppellate courts do not make factual findings in the first instance; we only review district court findings.\
• \[A]ppellate courts do not make factual findings in the first instance; we only review district court findings.\
• \[I]t is incumbent upon a defendant to establish the facts necessary to support his or her suppression motion in the district court.\
• lack of factual findings by district court can hamper ability to consider issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).