State v. Estill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that simply listing a defendant in a computer database after a single visit to the site of his former home did not constitute due diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Morris
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-02-18· cited 46×
• State v. Sorden
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-08-04· cited 39×
• State v. Peters
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-11-17· cited 8×
• State v. Thomas
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-03-19· cited 8×
• State v. Carcamo
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2003-10-28· cited 7×
• State v. Foster
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1996-06-28· cited 7×
• State v. Brown
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2016-04-20· cited 4×
• State v. Lawson
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-11-20· cited 3×
• State v. Gregory
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-03-05· cited 3×
• State v. GRUDEWICZ
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-03-23· cited 2×
• State v. Baptiste
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2008-10-01· cited 1×
• State v. Paul
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2012-10-03· cited 1×
• State v. Foster
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-02-15· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Driever
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-07-01· cited 38×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-10-17· cited 34×
• State v. Devito
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-12-15· cited 27×
• State v. Amarena
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-01-28· cited 25×
• State v. Groth
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-02-24· cited 22×
• State v. Nations
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-10-18· cited 20×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-05-17· cited 15×