State v. Estep
Citations
- 66 Kan. 416
- 71 P. 857
- 1903 Kan. LEXIS 74
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Intoxicating Liquors — Injunction Law of 1887 Repealed. That clause of section 4, chapter 165, of the Laws of 1887 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §2463), which created and defined a common nuisance under the prohibitory liquor law, and fixed a punishment on the owner or keeper thereof, was repealed by section. 1, chapter 232, Laws of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §2493). This repeal destroyed the force of the clause immediately following, providing a remedy by injunction to abate a nuisance of the kind mentioned in the first law, for the reason that that part of the section authorizing injunction proceedings operates against such nuisances only as are defined in the preceding portion of the same section of the law of 1887, which was repealed.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. RuhCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1917-02-09· cited 8×
- State v. StormSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-07-06· cited 7×
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-02-06· cited 3×
- Peak v. State ex rel. MeansSupreme Court of Kansas· 1903-05-09· cited 2×
- Pacific Express Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-02-06· cited 1×
- State ex rel. Moseley v. Wells, Fargo & Co. ExpressSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-04-09· cited 1×
- In re ManningSupreme Court of Kansas· 1909-04-10· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.