State v. Espinoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• party claiming error has burden to object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law to give district court opportunity to correct any alleged inadequacies
• \[A] factual record is required for any meaningful appellate review.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Carr
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2022-01-21· cited 19×
• State v. Shockley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2021-09-10· cited 10×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2024-06-28· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Seward
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-10-02· cited 92×
• State v. Reed
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-08-08· cited 63×
• – State v. Patterson –
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-01-10· cited 41×
• State v. Cervantes-Puentes
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-06-14· cited 15×