Ohio Supreme Court· 3/1/1996

State v. Esparza

Citations

1996 Ohio 233
74 Ohio St. 3d 660

Syllabus

Criminal law—Judge who rules on a Crim.R. 16(B)(1)(e) motion may not conduct the trial—Violation of rule not reversible error.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Liteky v. United States
Supreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 7,016×
Arizona v. Fulminante
Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
Tumey v. Ohio
Supreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
In Re Murchison.
Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
Vasquez v. Hillery
Supreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
State v. Gillard
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 184×
State v. Esparza
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 106×
State v. Esparza
Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-03-01· cited 45×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.