State v. Escalante

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A trial court in a criminal case does not acquire subject matter jurisdiction unless state files a formal and sufficient indictment or information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blakeney v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-03· cited 45×
• State v. Medicine Eagle
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-08-07· cited 29×
• State v. Randen
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 11×
• Hamilton v. Roehrich
  D. Minnesota· 2009-04-20· cited 4×
• State v. Arguello
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-07-13· cited 3×
• Lippold v. Meade Cty. Bd. of Comm'rs
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-01-24

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Honomichl v. State
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 47×
• Petition of Brockmueller
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-09-06· cited 30×
• State v. King
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 28×
• State v. Mosley
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-04-26· cited 16×
• Merchants Nat. Bank v. McKinney
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1891-05-28· cited 14×
• State v. Smejkal
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-11-05· cited 5×
• People v. Pizzaro
  New York Supreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 5×
• Scirica v. State
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-05-18· cited 3×