Skip to main content

State v. Erwin

Citations

  • 686 So. 2d 688
  • 1996 WL 729371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing motion to suppress because the defendant “was required to show bad faith upon the part of the state in destroying the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauksch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.