State v. Enquist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim that RCW 9A.44.130 implicates the right to travel in the context of offender subject to the statute’s transient reporting requirements
• Division Two of our court determined that the “inconvenience” of in-person registration is not punishment
• transient offender registration requirements do not violate ex post facto prohibition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).