State v. Engweiler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “limiting instructions are a per se requirement”
• stating that \limiting instructions are a per se requirement\
• under OEC 803(3), declarant’s statements of future intent “not rendered inadmissible merely because they also tend to suggest something about defendant’s conduct”
• “A mandatory sentence for aggravated murder cannot be imposed on a remanded juvenile who was under the age of 17 at the time of the offense.”
• so holding under ORS 161.620 (1989), amended by Or Laws 1989, ch 790, §3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).