· 7/10/2001
State v. Emry
Citations
- 753 N.E.2d 19
- 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 1180
- 2001 WL 767807
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Since Emry had exclusive 7 control over the vehicle, it was proper for the jury to infer that Emry had the intent and capability to exert dominion and control over the marijuana.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Bailey, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.