Skip to main content
· 7/10/2001

State v. Emry

Citations

  • 753 N.E.2d 19
  • 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 1180
  • 2001 WL 767807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since Emry had exclusive 7 control over the vehicle, it was proper for the jury to infer that Emry had the intent and capability to exert dominion and control over the marijuana.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Bailey, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.