State v. Emmund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \focus of the case should remain on the facts that are actually in dispute: whether the defendant possessed the firearm on the date charged\
• approving trial court's order prohibiting the State from using the statutory term \violent career criminal\
• reference to the defendant as a violent career criminal impinges on the defendant’s right to a fair trial as the jury will far more easily believe that he possessed a firearm
• State precluded from referring to defendant’s violent criminal career in jury’s presence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).