Skip to main content
· 10/27/1982

State v. Emmsley

Citations

  • 652 P.2d 1148
  • 3 Haw. App. 459
  • 1982 Haw. App. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court did not abuse its discretion in ruling that complaining witness’s juvenile adjudications as a law violator for committing the offenses of malicious conversion—i.e., theft of an automobile—and larceny were not relevant to witness’s veracity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Tanaka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.