State v. Emmi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that mere assertion given at trial, that court “should examine the legitimacy” of electronic surveillance without a warrant, was insufficient to preserve constitutional challenge for appeal
• argument not offered at trial will not be considered for first time on appeal, absent plain error
• argument not raised in trial court will not be considered for first time on appeal, absent plain error
• Court will not consider constitutional theory not offered before trial court
• application of Aguilar and Spinelli test in warrant situations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).