State v. Embry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the mere filing of a motion to suppress does not ipso facto negate a previously filed demand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Obanion v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-11-04· cited 26×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-20· cited 10×
• State v. Kaufman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-11-10· cited 10×
• Dickey v. McNeal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-23· cited 7×
• State v. Reaves
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-02· cited 4×
• Florida Greyhound Owners & Breeders Ass'n v. West Flagler Associates, Ltd.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-04-21· cited 4×
• Hopkins v. Barad
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-03-11· cited 3×
• Perry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-24· cited 2×
• Florida Greyhound, Etc. v. West Flagler Assoc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-04-21
• Duggins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-17
• Embry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-02-06
• State v. Wilson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-09-08

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Hanks v. Goodman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-10-06· cited 48×
• Turner v. State Ex Rel. Pellerin
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-01-10· cited 18×
• State Ex Rel. Ranalli v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-04-04· cited 14×
• Embry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-08-23· cited 1×
• State v. Perry
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-09-03· cited 1×