State v. Elston
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 958
Syllabus
Per Mayle, J., trial court erroneously imposed consecutive sentences as if they were mandatory under R.C. 2921.331(D). Because consecutive sentences were not mandatory, court was not required to inform appellant at plea hearing of the possibility of imposing consecutive sentences. Trial court's inclusion of all possible terms of postrelease control in sentencing entry did not reflect notice it gave at sentencing hearing. Court previously dismissed count so did not need to include it in sentencing entry.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. QuallsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 244×
- State v. CobbledickOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-01· cited 8×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-10· cited 7×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-12· cited 5×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-22· cited 5×
- State v. WhitneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-31· cited 5×
- State v. JefferyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-01· cited 4×
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-01-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.