Skip to main content

State v. Ellis

Citations

  • 859 P.2d 632
  • 71 Wash. App. 400
  • 1993 Wash. App. LEXIS 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • similar double jeopardy claim was constitutional in magnitude and therefore reviewable despite defendant's failure to object to instructions at trial
  • four separate \to convict\ instructions given for two counts of child molestation and two counts of child rape
  • similar double jeopardy claim was constitutional in magnitude and therefore reviewable despite defendant’s failure to object to instructions at trial
  • Count II stated, “ ‘on a day other than Count 1,’ ” and Counts III and IV contained different charging periods.
  • four separate “to convict” instructions given for two counts of child molestation and two counts of child rape
  • double jeopardy claim may be raised for first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.