State v. Elliott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• presumption exists that the judge in a court-tried case \was not confused or misled by any allegedly irrelevant or inadmissible evidence unless the record clearly demonstrates the court considered and relied upon the inadmissible evidence\
• presumption exists that the judge in a court-tried case “was not confused or misled by any allegedly irrelevant or inadmissible evidence unless the record clearly demonstrates that the trial court considered and relied upon the inadmissible evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Elliott v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-01-14· cited 5×
• State of Missouri v. Jesse Lydell Hicks
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-11-18· cited 3×
• State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Cartell Hogue
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-06-14· cited 3×
• Gray v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-07-06· cited 2×
• State of Missouri v. Joseph Michael Wilson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-06-23
• IN THE INTEREST OF P.J.T., SCOTT COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICER, Petitioner-Respondent v. P.J.T.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-11-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Forrest
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2006-01-10· cited 259×
• State v. Smith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-02-10· cited 37×
• State v. Blakey
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-10-30· cited 28×
• State v. Driscoll
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2001-09-11· cited 26×
• State v. Hayes
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-06-24· cited 10×
• State v. Thornhill
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-02-28· cited 6×