South Dakota Supreme Court· 10/5/1983
State v. Ell
Citations
- 338 N.W.2d 845
- 1983 S.D. LEXIS 408
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a defendant “need not come forward with additional evidence of ownership” when property is seized from him “unless there are serious reasons to doubt” his right to the property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dunn, Morgan, Fosheim, Wollman, Henderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-12-04· cited 328×
- United States v. Patricia Ann Wright, United States of America v. Shirley Ann Boyd, A/K/A Kim, A/K/A LisaD.C. Circuit· 1979-09-28· cited 120×
- Sovereign News Co. v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1983-01-11· cited 119×
- United States v. Anthony P. Lafatch, and Mm CorporationSixth Circuit· 1977-11-18· cited 86×
- State v. Shank & BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1975-02-27· cited 59×
- Matter of Estate of NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-02-09· cited 44×
- State v. EllNebraska Supreme Court· 1976-11-03· cited 36×
- State v. SweattSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-03-30· cited 26×
- United States Fire Insurance Co. v. DaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 18×
- State v. CodySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 17×
- State v. HerraldSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-09-06· cited 16×
- Stewart v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1977-07-25· cited 13×
- State v. HolmesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-08-31· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.