Skip to main content
· 3/24/1987

State v. Eli

Citations

  • 402 N.W.2d 627
  • 1987 Minn. App. LEXIS 4173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that defendant’s challenge to the identity of the donor of a blood sample was a foundational objection that should have been raised at the time the test results were introduced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.