State v. Elfadi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \section 3307(d) is an exception to the ADEA” because to apply the ADEA \would require us to adopt a strained reading of section 3307(d
• concluding that the personnel exception applied to a Bureau of Prisons’ hiring policy of not considering for employment anyone over the age of 34
• holding that mandatory employment limits based upon age for federal employees are not subject to the strict requirements of the ADEA and need only be rationally related to a permissible government objective
• holding that “section 3307(d) is an exception to the ADEA” because to apply the ADEA “would require us to adopt a strained reading of section 3307(d
• holding that mandatory employment limits based upon age for federal employees are not subject to the strict requirements of the ADEA and need only be rationally related to a permissible government objective
• concluding that § 3307(d) serves as an exception to the ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).