State v. Eleneki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of a ruse does not necessarily violate HRS § 803-37
• holding that the use of a ruse does not necessarily violate HRS § 803-37
• examining the policies behind the statutes where neither the plain language nor the legislative history provide guidance as to the issue in question
• “Although the language of HRS §§ 803-11 and 803-37 differs, the purposes of the ‘knock and announce rule’ are identical in each context . . . .”
• explaining the three purposes of the knock and announce rule
• explaining the three purposes of the knock and announce rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).