State v. Electroplating, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing in dicta that the collateral evidence rule is applied in conjunction with Tenn. R. Evid. 613
• noting Tenn. R. App. P. 3(e) waiver does not apply when the issue, if meritorious, would result in dismissal of the prosecution
• first citing State v. Parker, 932 S.W.2d 945, 958 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996); and then Bonestel, 871 S.W.2d at 168

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).