Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/16/2006
State v. Eldridge
Citations
- 142 P.3d 82
- 207 Or. App. 337
- 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inventory policy may not require search of all containers in an impounded vehicle regardless of whether the container is normally associated with holding valuables
- police inventory policy did not adequately limit discretion because it lacked standardized criteria or procedures regarding the scope of each inventory
- “[T]he North Bend inventory program lacks standardized criteria or procedures that properly prevent officer discretion and limit each inventory to a scope that is a constitutional administrative action rather than an unlawful warrantless search.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-09· cited 22×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-15· cited 11×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-16· cited 6×
- State v. KayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-08· cited 5×
- State v. CordovaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-13· cited 5×
- State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 4×
- State v. ROTTENKOLBERCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-06· cited 1×
- State v. TowaiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.