Skip to main content
· 4/10/2001

State v. Eisenhouer

Citations

  • 40 S.W.3d 916
  • 2001 Mo. LEXIS 33
  • 2001 WL 350659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The mere exclusion of evidence based on a rule of evidence does not have the substantive effect of a motion to suppress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holstein, Price, Limbaugh, White, Wolff, Benton, Stith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.