State v. Ehmke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he trial court must find that there has been a violation by clear and convincing evidence,” citing Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.04 subd. 3 [3]”
• affirming revocation of probation where defendant was intoxicated at time of underlying offense and defendant violated probation by receiving multiple DWI convictions
• affirming revocation of probation based on DWI convictions after appellant received probation for assault occurring while he was very intoxicated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).