Skip to main content
· 2/6/2001

State v. Edwards, P1/99-4284a (2001)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that enhancement accomplishes task of treating \criminal conduct more seriously as the number of stolen identities increases\
  • observing that application note 2 prohibits an enhancement based on nature of crime but not one \based on the extent of such a crime\ (emphasis in original)
  • “A proper occasion for using application note 2 to § 2B1.6 would be when the sentencing court would otherwise apply USSG § 2B1.1(b)(11)(C) . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: SAVAGE, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.