State v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an intimate relationship between a defense investigator and a state witness did not constitute an ethical violation as to defense counsel
• holding that trial court’s refusal to appoint substitute counsel did not prejudice the defendant, because there was no evidence that his defense was impaired by his counsel’s lack of investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Keerins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-31· cited 19×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-22· cited 7×
• State v. Pyle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-10· cited 2×
• State v. Estacio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-13· cited 1×