State v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “litigant must object to inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law before the trial court to preserve the issue for appeal,” citing Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, 282 Kan. 349, 356, 144 P.3d 1279 [2006]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Herbel
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-04-05· cited 154×
• State v. Quartez Brown
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-08-15· cited 103×
• State v. Kelly
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-12-10· cited 83×
• Miami County Board of Commissioners v. Kanza Rail-Trails Conservancy, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-06-10· cited 78×
• Build It & They Will Drink, Inc. v. Strauch
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2011-06-06· cited 20×