Supreme Court of Vermont· 11/7/1989
State v. Edwards
Citations
- 569 A.2d 1075
- 153 Vt. 649
- 1989 Vt. LEXIS 238
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in appropriate circumstances, exclusion of witnesses as discovery sanction does not offend defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights
- one circumstance justifying trial court’s sanction of preclusion of witnesses was cumulative nature of witnesses’ testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, C.J., and Peck, Gibson, Dooley and Morse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GregaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-10-07· cited 66×
- State v. CongressSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-12-05· cited 23×
- State v. VerrinderSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-27· cited 15×
- State v. PassinoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-03-18· cited 13×
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-10-16· cited 9×
- State v. HugoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-04-12· cited 6×
- State v. GulleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-08-10· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- Douglas D. Chappee v. George VoseFirst Circuit· 1988-03-28· cited 66×
- People v. PronovostSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-05-15· cited 42×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Vermont· 1976-02-04· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. PorcherMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-11-07· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.