State v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The presumption is that legislatures do not include in statutes provisions which are redundant, void, inert and trivial.”
• presumption is that legislature does not intend to enact redundant laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Deddens
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-25· cited 43×
• State v. Moerman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-12-13· cited 19×
• State v. Forrester
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-21· cited 18×
• State v. Kozlowski
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-11-27· cited 15×
• Campbell v. Superior Court, County of Maricopa
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-12-12· cited 13×
• Garrett v. Tubac-Amado School District No. 5 of Santa Cruz County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-03-18· cited 11×
• Renalwest L.C. v. Arizona Department of Revenue
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-01-21· cited 8×
• Vega v. Morris
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 8×
• State v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-10-02· cited 7×
• O'Hara v. Superior Ct. of State of Ariz.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-10· cited 7×
• Aida Renta Trust v. Department of Revenue
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-01· cited 5×
• Greves v. Ohio State Life Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-11-26· cited 4×
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1984-02-23
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1984-07-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Mesa v. Killingsworth
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-07-21· cited 120×
• City of Phoenix v. Yates
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1949-05-02· cited 72×
• Phoenix Title & Trust Company v. Burns
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-09-30· cited 24×
• Fitzpatrick v. Board of Medical Examiners
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-07-21· cited 7×