State v. Edner
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 1365
Syllabus
Theft R.C. 2913.02 blank checks forgery R.C. 2913.31 allied offenses separate conduct consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) restitution contrary to law. The theft of blank checks and the ensuing forging of those checks to steal a sum certain are not allied offenses subject to merger. The trial court made all the required consecutive sentencing findings, and the defendant failed to challenge whether the findings were supported by the record. The imposition of restitution was contrary to law because no evidence was offered in support of the amount of restitution actually imposed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \judge may take into account a disparity among the sentences of codefendants\
- motion to revise and revoke under rule 29 [a]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.