State v. Edmonds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the transcript of a victim interview satisfying the foundational requirements of the exception was not inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Edmonds
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-02-28· cited 21×
• U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. McCoy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-28· cited 8×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-05· cited 187×
• State v. Serrano
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-04-17· cited 57×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Pfaff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-22· cited 32×
• Holbrook v. Precision Helicopters, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-15· cited 13×
• State v. Scally
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-13· cited 8×
• State v. Cain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-23· cited 8×
• State v. Cappleman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-07-27· cited 3×