State v. Eder
Citations
- 36 Wash. 482
- 78 P. 1023
- 1904 Wash. LEXIS 579
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law — Evidence of Other Crimes — Impeachment of Witness — Attempt to Correct Inadverent Statements of Wife. It is reversible error to permit the state, upon' cross-examination of the accused’s wife, to show that the accused had been convicted of another crime some years before, and it is not a sufficient excuse that the same was shown to correct the statement that she had married the accused about the year 1898, at which time he was in prison, the same being an inadvertence, she having married him in 1899.</p> <p>Same — Credibility of Witness — Impeachment of Wife of Accused by Fact of Former Conviction. It is not permissible, on the cross-examination of the accused’s wife, for the state to show that the accused had been convicted of another crime some years before, and before their marriage, in order to affect the credibility of the wife, since the fact tends directly to prejudice the accused, and only remotely, if at all, to discredit the witness.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- George L. Smith v. B. J. Rhay, Warden of the Washington State PenitentiaryNinth Circuit· 1970-01-01· cited 65×
- State v. ConwaySupreme Court of Missouri· 1912-03-21· cited 41×
- State v. MarselleWashington Supreme Court· 1906-07-27· cited 18×
- State v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-24· cited 10×
- State v. StrodemierWashington Supreme Court· 1905-12-06· cited 5×
- State v. GairnsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-05-22
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.