State v. Edelman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant was subject to criminal liability for violation of Connecticut’s uniform budding code without a showing of culpable intent
• concluding that court’s denial of defendant’s timely request for jury poll, made after jury had returned verdict and prior to jury’s discharge, required automatic reversal of judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Calderon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-04-06· cited 24×
• State v. MAURICE M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-07-28· cited 7×
• State v. Edelman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-02-18· cited 6×
• State v. James P.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-06-13· cited 6×
• State v. Arkell
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-03-14· cited 1×
• State v. Edelman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-11-14· cited 1×
• State v. Angel A. (Dissent)
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-10-07

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pickering
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-03-04· cited 123×
• State v. Pare
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-11· cited 71×
• State v. Erzen
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-12-01· cited 21×
• State v. George
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-03-28· cited 20×
• State v. Lewtan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-08-27· cited 19×
• State v. Jones
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-12-15· cited 8×