State v. Eckert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in assessing “whether the erroneous admission of disputed evidence was harmless, we describe and review all pertinent portions of the record”
• in assessing “whether the erroneous admission of disputed evidence was harmless, we describe and review all pertinent portions of the record”
• evidentiary error had little likelihood of affecting the verdict where “[t]he jury was presented with overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt” and “[important parts of that evidence are not in dispute”
• evidentiary error had little likelihood of affecting the verdict where \[t]he jury was presented with overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt\ and \[i]mportant parts of that evidence are not in dispute\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Villanueva-Villanueva
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-30· cited 7×
• State v. Basua
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-24· cited 5×
• State v. Mackey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-14· cited 4×
• State v. Berry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-27· cited 3×
• State v. Hernandez-Fabian
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 3×
• State v. Cervantes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-20· cited 2×
• State v. James
  Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 2×