State v. Eckelberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that uncorroborated, inconclusive, self-serving testimony about distant events was insufficient to carry burden of showing invalid prior conviction
• holding that uncorroborated, inconclusive, self-serving testimony about distant events was insufficient to carry burden of showing invalid prior conviction
• explaining why defendant’s “vague [and] inconclusive testimony” about distant events was insufficient to carry his burden of showing invalidity of prior conviction
• explaining why defendant’s “vague [and] inconclusive testimony” about distant events was insufficient to carry his burden of showing invalidity of prior conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).