State v. Eccles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “sanitized condition” only required a defendant “to respond to questions that could not incriminate him in future criminal proceedings” (emphasis added)
• noting that the “sanitized condition” only required a defendant “to respond to questions that could not incriminate him in future criminal proceedings” (emphasis added)
• noting that the “sanitized condition” only required a defendant “to respond to questions that could not incriminate him in future criminal proceedings” (emphasis added)
• probation condition requiring probationer “to waive his right against self-incrimination under penalty of having his probation revoked” impermissible attempt to coerce waiver even if coercion ineffective
• “We cannot harmonize a constitutional rule forbidding a requirement that a probationer waive his privilege against self-incrimination with a holding that a probationer nevertheless waives the illegality by not expressly rejecting the forbidden condition and opting for additional imprisonment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).